Cover Image

A systematic review of quality indicators for appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized adult patients

Marlot C. Kallen, Jan M. Prins
  • Marlot C. Kallen
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands | m.c.kallen@amc.uva.nl
  • Jan M. Prins
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

Many quality indicators for appropriate antibiotic use have been developed. We aimed to make a systematic inventory, including the development methodology and validation procedures, of currently available quality indicators (QIs) for appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized adult patients. We performed a literature search in the Pubmed interface. From the included articles we abstracted i) the indicators developed ii) the type of infection the QIs applied to iii) study design used for the development of the QIs iv) relation of the QIs to outcome measures v) whether the QIs were validated and vi) the characteristics of the validation cohort. Fourteen studies were included, in which 200 QIs were developed. The most frequently mentioned indicators concerned empirical antibiotic therapy according to the guideline (71% of studies), followed by switch from IV to oral therapy (64% of studies), followed by drawing at least two sets of blood cultures and change to pathogen-directed therapy based on culture results (57% of studies). Most QIs were specifically developed for lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection or sepsis. A RAND-modified Delphi procedure was used in the majority of studies (57%). Six studies took outcome measures into consideration during the procedure. Five out of fourteen studies (36%) tested the clinimetric properties of the QIs and 65% of the tested QIs were considered valid. Many studies report the development of quality indicators for appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized adult patients. However, only a small number of studies validated the developed QIs. Future validation of QIs is needed if we want to implement them in daily practice.

Keywords

Quality indicator; Quality improvement; Appropriate antibiotic use; Antibiotic stewardship

Full Text:

PDF
APPENDIX
HTML
Submitted: 2016-08-04 12:14:57
Published: 2017-03-30 09:14:42
Search for citations in Google Scholar
Related articles: Google Scholar
Abstract views:
618

Views:
PDF
379
APPENDIX
156
HTML
336

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Copyright (c) 2017 Marlot C. Kallen, Jan M. Prins

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 
© PAGEPress 2008-2017     -     PAGEPress is a registered trademark property of PAGEPress srl, Italy.     -     VAT: IT02125780185