Radiofrequency therapy in back pain and complex regional pain syndrome


Submitted: 22 September 2011
Accepted: 13 October 2011
Published: 9 November 2011
Abstract Views: 1397
PDF: 634
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Norina Bergamin Division of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Armin Aeschbach Division of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Beat A. Michel Division of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Haiko Sprott Division of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.
Percutaneous radiofrequency procedures are frequently used in the management of chronic pain. Continuous radiofrequency (CRF) has been established as a safe and effective treatment for pain originating from facet and sacroiliac joints by way of co-agulation of their nerve supply. Different methods have been proposed to account for the complex nerve supply of the sacroiliac joint. Due to its neurodestructive property, CRF was limited to the treatment of neuropathic pain. When applied to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) for spinal pain or to the sympathetic ganglia in treatment of CRPS, heat related side effects have been reported. With the development of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), a less destructive alternative to CRF became available, that is more suitable to treat neuropathic pain. PRF was adopted in the treatment of several pain conditions with different success. The results with PRF adjacent to the DRG are promising, whereas for facet and sacroiliac joint pain PRF could not yet be proven equally effective as CRF. As for PRF in CRPS there is almost no evidence available. The potential of PRF seems to lie in those areas where CRF is of limited value. Con-versely, it is questionable if PRF will ever be equally effective in indications, where CRF is already well established. Despite its active use in clinical practice, PRF is not validated yet nor is its mode of action. The literature in both cases is accumulating but further studies are urgently needed.

Supporting Agencies


Bergamin, N., Aeschbach, A., Michel, B. A., & Sprott, H. (2011). Radiofrequency therapy in back pain and complex regional pain syndrome. Rheumatology Reports, 3(1), e12. https://doi.org/10.4081/rr.2011.e12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations