Hoshi, Oebisu, Takada, Wakasa, and Nakamura: A Case of Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Showing a Biphasic Pattern on 2-Deoxy-2-F18-Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

A Case of Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Showing a Biphasic Pattern on 2-Deoxy-2-F18-Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

Abstract

Abstract

Integrated 2-deoxy-2-F18-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has been used in the field of soft tissue sarcoma. We report an 81-year-old man with dedifferentiated liposarcoma in the left thigh, which was composed of well-differentiated liposarcoma and pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma. As well as other radiological modalities, FDG-PET was able to demonstrate a biphasic signal pattern composed of well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated area, being consistent with the histological grade of malignancy.




Introduction

Currently, integrated 2-deoxy-2-F18-fluoro-Dglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDGPET/CT) is increasingly used for the management of patients with various kinds of cancer including soft tissue tumors. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma occurs in up to 10% of well-differentiated liposarcoma, and has a tendency to occur in the retroperitoneum, extremities, spermatic cord, and rarely, the head and neck.1 This tumor is generally composed of fatty and non-fatty solid components. To the best of our knowledge, there are few instances in the literature regarding the radiological finding of dedifferentiated liposarcoma on FDG-PET. Here, we report an 81-year-old man with differentiated liposarcoma in the left thigh, and an evaluation of the tumor on FDG-PET. The patient and his family were informed that the data from the case would be submitted for publication, and their consent was provided.

Case Report

This case involves an 81-year-old male who suffered from a gradual buildup of a mass on his left thigh over a thirty year period. The tumor suddenly increased in size three months before he visited a clinic: he was immediately referred to our hospital. At the first visit to our hospital, physical examination revealed an elastic hard mass of size 40×20 cm in the left thigh. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated two components of the tumor, which occupied the intermedius and vastus medialis of the quadriceps femoris. One component was of low-to-intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences with heterogeneously high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequence, mainly in the deeper region. The other was of high signal intensity on T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences, consistent with a lipomatous tumor, mainly in the distal portion (Figure 1A,B), and the former lesion was remarkably enhanced with contrast material (Figure 1C). The tumor had a thick septum with a well-defined border. The borderline of these tumors was relatively distinct. FDG-PET showed the biphasic pattern composed of two components. The proximal component showed high FDG uptake (SUVmax; 2.3), while the distal component disclosed low FDG uptake (SUVmax; 0.7) (Figure 1D). The patient underwent a needle biopsy. Pathologically, a pleomorphic sarcoma was found and a wide resection of the tumor was carried out.2,3 Macroscopic evaluation of the resected specimen confirmed the radiological imaging of these two distinctively separated lesions, which were composed of a yellow fat-like mass and a firm and multi-nodular white mass (Figure 2A). The microscopic feature of the yellow component was a proliferation of fat cells including multilobular lipoblasts, representing well-differentiated liposarcoma. That of the white component was pleomorphic cell sarcoma, resembling pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma (Figure 2B). The final pathological diagnosis was recognized as dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Systemic chemotherapy was not carried out, due to the advanced age of this patient. No recurrence and no distant metastases were detected three months after the surgery.

Discussion and Conclusions

Liposarcoma is a malignant soft tissue sarcoma that occurs in adults, and makes up 16-18% of all soft tissue sarcomas.4 Liposarcoma is generally classified into four subtypes: well differentiated, dedifferentiated, myxoid/round, and pleomorphic. According to the World Health Organization,1 dedifferentiated liposarcoma is defined as malignant adipocytic neoplasm showing transition from atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma to non-lipogenic sarcoma of variable histological grade. Therefore, this definition may show the coexistence of both fatty and non-fatty solid components.

Currently, radiological findings of liposarcomas, based on CT and MRI, are analyzed in detail. These findings have been shown to have a close relationship to pathology.5-7 The other newly appearing sarcomatous signals arose from the radiological feature characteristic of well-differentiated liposarcoma.8 The well-differentiated and dedifferentiated components had abrupt transitions between their borders. The term biphasic pattern in liposarcoma has been generally adopted to explain dedifferentiated liposarcoma. FDG-PET can determine tumor functions of high metabolism and an increased rate of glucose utilization compared with normal tissues. The high capacity of glucose utilization is a possible reflection of the tumor’s malignant nature. High maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is one of the informative biomarkers measured with this modality for the differential diagnosis between low and high grade soft tissue tumors. Microscopically, the fatty lesions of well-differentiated liposarcoma presented low FDG uptake, and the latter component of the anaplastic zones of spindle and pleomorphic cell lesions, being judged as pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma, presented high FDG uptake. The higher the pathological grade of tumor is, the higher their SUV in FDG-PET/CT is.9 FDG-PET could also show the biphasic pattern in liposarcoma, as well as other radiological modalities.

With respect to treatment of dedifferentiated liposarcoma, wide resection with negative surgical margins is important, while the role of systemic chemotherapy is controversial.10 The follow-up period is too short to make a comment about the surgical result of this case. Our group previously reported on surgical margins for newly appearing dedifferentiated high grade regions, and concluded that a wide margin resection should be performed.11 Further careful follow-up is necessary for this case.

Using macroscopic and microscopic techniques, we identified two components in the dedifferentiated liposarcoma of our patient. The first was a well-differentiated liposarcoma. The second was pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma. This FDG-PET finding of a biphasic pattern in dedifferentiated liposarcoma was identical to the various kinds of radiological findings.

References

1. 

AP Dei Tos, F Pedeutour. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma. In: CDM Fletcher, KK Unni, F Mertens, eds. World Health Organization classification of tumors: pathology and genetics; tumors of soft tissue and bone. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2002. pp 38-39.

2. 

N Kawaguchi, AR Ahmed, S Matsumoto. The concept of curative margin in surgery for bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004:165-72.

3. 

N Kawaguchi, S Matsumoto, J Manabe. New method of evaluating the surgical margin and safety margin for musculoskeletal sarcoma, analyzed on the basis of 457 surgical cases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1995;121:555-63.

4. 

FM Enzinger, SW Weiss. Liposarcomas. In: FM Enzinger, SW Weiss, eds. Soft tissue tumors, 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995. pp 431-466.

5. 

R Arkun, A Memis, T Akalin. Liposarcoma of soft tissue: MRI findings with pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol 1997;26:167-72.

6. 

WH Henricks, YC Chu, JR Goldblum, SW Weiss. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma. A clinicopathological analysis of 155 cases with a proposal for an expanded definition of dedifferentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:271-81.

7. 

MJ Kransdorf, LW Bancroft, JJ Peterson. Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. Radiology 2002;224:99-104.

8. 

S Ehara, AE Rosenberg, SV Kattapuram. Atypical lipomas, lipomas, and other fatcontaining sarcomas: CT analysis of the fat element. Clin Imaging 1995;19:50-3.

9. 

MR Benz, SM Dry, FC Eilber. Correlation between glycolytic phenotype and tumor grade in soft-tissue sarcomas by 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1174-81.

10. 

K Okada, T Hasegawa, A Kawai. Primary (de novo) dedifferentiated liposarcoma in the extremities: a multiinstitution Tohoku Musculoskeletal Tumor Society study of 18 cases in northern Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011;41:1094-100.

11. 

M Hoshi, S Matsumoto, J Manabe. Surgery for dedifferentiated liposarcoma, presenting two radiologically and pathologically distinctive patterns. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2006;36:462-7.

Figure 1.

Magnetic resonance imaging on T1 (A) and T2 (B) sequences of axial view demonstrated a biphasic pattern of lipogenic mass and non-lipogenic mass in the quadriceps femoris. C) Enhanced T1 sequence of coronal view displayed the prominent enhanced mass in the dedifferentiated lesion of the proximal lesion. D) FDG-PET showed the biphasic pattern composed of high and low grade mass in the left thigh.

rt-2013-2-e26-g001.jpg
Figure 2.

A) Sagittal view of the gross finding of the resected specimen displayed a yellow fatty tumor in the distal lesion and a multiple-nodular white solid mass in the distal lesion. B) A biphasic pattern composed of well-differentiated liposarcoma containing lipoblasts and pleomorphic-spindle cell sarcoma resembling malignant fibrous histiocytoma was found microscopically.

rt-2013-2-e26-g002.jpg
Abstract views:
1638

Views:
PDF
212
HTML
215

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Copyright (c) 2013 Manabu Hoshi, Naoto Oebisu, Jun Takada, Kenichi Wakasa, Hiroaki Nakamura

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 
© PAGEPress 2008-2018     -     PAGEPress is a registered trademark property of PAGEPress srl, Italy.     -     VAT: IT02125780185