Just a crush? Contamination of archaeological samples by different grinding media


Submitted: 22 August 2014
Accepted: 1 December 2014
Published: 18 December 2014
Abstract Views: 1624
PDF: 756
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

A chert cobble from an archaeological quarry on southern Baffin Island, Canada, was divided and crushed using five different methods: i) agate mortar and pestle, ii) stainless steel shatterbox, iii) tungsten carbide shatterbox, iv) alumina ceramic shatterbox, and v) zirconia ceramic shatterbox. Powders produced by each method were submitted for acid digestion and analysis by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The trace element results indicate that different crushing media can contribute significant trace element contamination to chert during the grinding process. These results demonstrate the need for an informed approach to the selection of sample preparation methods when submitting archaeological samples for solution or pellet based geochemical analysis.

Supporting Agencies

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Manitoba Research and Innovation Fund, Manitoba Heritage Grants, Northern Scientific Training Program, The Polar Continental Shelf Project,

ten Bruggencate, R. E., Fayek, M., Milne, B., Park, R. W., & Stenton, D. R. (2014). Just a crush? Contamination of archaeological samples by different grinding media. Open Journal of Archaeometry, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/arc.2014.5606

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations