Just a crush? Contamination of archaeological samples by different grinding media

  • Rachel E. ten Bruggencate | tenbrugg@cc.umanitoba.ca Centre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba, Canada.
  • Mostafa Fayek Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada.
  • Brooke Milne Centre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba, Canada.
  • Robert W. Park Department of Anthropology, University of Waterloo, Canada.
  • Douglas R. Stenton Department of Anthropology, University of Waterloo, Canada.

Abstract

A chert cobble from an archaeological quarry on southern Baffin Island, Canada, was divided and crushed using five different methods: i) agate mortar and pestle, ii) stainless steel shatterbox, iii) tungsten carbide shatterbox, iv) alumina ceramic shatterbox, and v) zirconia ceramic shatterbox. Powders produced by each method were submitted for acid digestion and analysis by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The trace element results indicate that different crushing media can contribute significant trace element contamination to chert during the grinding process. These results demonstrate the need for an informed approach to the selection of sample preparation methods when submitting archaeological samples for solution or pellet based geochemical analysis.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2014-12-18
Info
Issue
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
chert, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, contamination, sample preparation, provenance
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 1407

  • PDF: 566
How to Cite
ten Bruggencate, R. E., Fayek, M., Milne, B., Park, R. W., & Stenton, D. R. (2014). Just a crush? Contamination of archaeological samples by different grinding media. Open Journal of Archaeometry, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/arc.2014.5606