Allergic contact dermatitis from sculptured acrylic nails: special presentation with an airborne pattern


Submitted: 18 August 2011
Accepted: 12 March 2012
Published: 28 May 2012
Abstract Views: 4148
PDF: 782
HTML: 7398
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Paula Maio Contact Dermatitis Unit, Dermatology and Venereology Department, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Rodrigo Carvalho Contact Dermatitis Unit, Dermatology and Venereology Department, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Cristina Amaro Contact Dermatitis Unit, Dermatology and Venereology Department, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Raquel Santos Contact Dermatitis Unit, Dermatology and Venereology Department, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Jorge Cardoso Contact Dermatitis Unit, Dermatology and Venereology Department, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
Methylmethacrylate was first reported in 1941 as a cause of contact dermatitis. Since then, occupational contact allergies to acrylates in dentistry, orthopedic surgery, printing industry and industry have been reported, but few reports are found in the literature as a consequence of the contact with sculptured artificial acrylic nails which are increasingly popular. We describe here 3 patients with contact allergy to acrylates in artificial sculptured nails. Patch tests were performed with the Portuguese baseline series of contact allergens and an extended series of acrylates were applied. In particular, we tested three female patients with allergic contact dermatitis from sculptured acrylic nails. Two of these patients were both customers and also technical nail beauticians. Two patients developed periungual eczema; one presented only with face and eyelid dermatitis had no other lesions. The tests showed positive reaction to 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (2-HEMA) and 2-hydroxypropylmethacrylate (2-HPMA) in all the three patients. Our cases demonstrate the variety of clinical presentations of allergic contact dermatitis from acrylic sculptured nails. They show the need to warn patients of persistent and sometimes permanent side effects of these products. They also emphasize the importance of cosmetic ingredient labeling.

Supporting Agencies


Maio, P., Carvalho, R., Amaro, C., Santos, R., & Cardoso, J. (2012). Allergic contact dermatitis from sculptured acrylic nails: special presentation with an airborne pattern. Dermatology Reports, 4(1), e6. https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2012.e6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.