Treatment for unicameral bone cysts in long bones: an evidence based review

Main Article Content

Sandra E. Donaldson *
Josie Chundamala
Suzanne Yandow
James G. Wright
(*) Corresponding Author:
Sandra E. Donaldson | sandra.donaldson@sickkids.ca

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to perform an evidence based review for treatment of unicameral bone cysts. A search of MEDLINE (1966 to 2009) was conducted and the studies were classified according to levels of evidence. This review includes only comparative Level I-III studies. The systematic review identified 16 studies. There is one level I study, one level II study and the remaining 14 studies are level III. Seven of the sixteen studies had statistically different results: three studies indicated that steroid injection was superior to bone marrow injection or curettage and bone grafting; one study indicated that cannulated screws were superior to steroid injections; one study indicated resection and myoplasty was superior to steroid injection; one study indicated a combination of steroid, demineralized bone matrix and bone marrow aspirate, and curettage and bone grafting were superior to steroid injection; and one study indicated that curettage and bone grafting was superior to non-operative immobilization. Based on one Level I study, including a limited number of individuals, steroid injection seems to be superior to bone marrow injection. As steroid injections have already demonstrated superiority over bone marrow injections in a randomized clinical trial, the next step would be a prospective trial comparing steroid injections with other treatments.

Downloads month by month

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Author Biography

Sandra E. Donaldson, The Hospital for Sick Children

Clinical Research Project Manager, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children