Dry-season habitat occupancy by ungulate tiger prey in the Hukaung Valley of northern Myanmar


Submitted: 29 September 2022
Accepted: 3 August 2023
Published: 7 September 2023
Abstract Views: 531
SUPPLEMENTARY PDF: 133
PDF: 174
HTML: 5
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Hla Naing Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA; Wildlife Conservation Society Myanmar Program, Yangon, Myanmar.
  • Todd K. Fuller Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4805-5460
  • Paul R. Sievert Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States.
  • Timothy O. Randhir Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States.
  • Saw Htoo Tha Po Wildlife Conservation Society Myanmar Program, Yangon, Myanmar.
  • Saw Htun Wildlife Conservation Society Myanmar Program, Yangon, Myanmar.
  • Than Myint Wildlife Conservation Society Myanmar Program, Yangon, Myanmar.

We assessed habitat occupancy and distribution of principal tiger (Panthera tigris) ungulate prey species to assess factors affecting their occurrence and their potential contribution to low tiger presence in the core part of the Hukaung Valley Wildlife Sanctuary, in northern Myanmar. We surveyed for signs on 1,651 km of transects partitioned into 554 sampling units between November 2007 and May 2008. By incorporating seven environmental and four social covariates, we predicted habitat occupancy rates of 0.76 for gaur (Bos gaurus), 0.91 for sambar (Rusa unicolor), 0.57 for wild pigs (Sus scrofa), and 0.89 for northern red muntjac (Muntiacus vaginalis). Overall, shorter Euclidean distances to ranger stations and trails, decreased stream density, and broadleaved evergreen/semi-deciduous forest and relatively rare rain-fed cropland habitat occurrence positively influenced prey habitat occupancy; conversely, shorter Euclidean distances to villages, roads, and streams, higher elevations, and occurrence of mixed broadleaved and needle-leaved forest habitat negatively influenced occupancy. In addition, Euclidean distance to ranger stations, trails, and roads positively affected species detections, whereas shorter Euclidean distance to villages and streams, high elevations, and high precipitation negatively affected detections. Results indicated that all four prey species were relatively well-distributed through the Sanctuary core area, but comparisons with indices of abundance elsewhere suggest that prey density was low and would not likely support many tigers.


Arino O, Ramos Perez JJ, Kalogirou V, Bontemps S, Defourny P, Van Bogaert E. 2012. Global Land Cover Map for 2009 (GlobCover 2009). ©European Space Agency (ESA) & Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.787668

Barber-Meyer SM, Jnawali SR, Karki JB, Khanal P, Lohani S, Long B, MacKenzie DI, Pandav B, Pradhan NMB, Shrestha R, Subedi N. 2013. Influence of prey depletion and human disturbance on tiger occupancy in Nepal. Journal of Zoology. 289:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012. 00956.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00956.x

Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L. 2001. Introduction to distance sampling. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. 448 pp. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference. 2nd ed. New York (NY), USA: Springer-Verlag. 514 pp.

Dinerstein E, Loucks C, Wikramanayake E, Ginsberg J, Sanderson E, Seidensticker J, Forrest J, Bryja G, Heydlauff A, Klenzendorf S, et al. 2006. The fate of wild tigers. BioScience. 57:508–514. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/B570608

Duangchantrasiri S, Jornburom P, Jinamoy S, Pattanavibool A, Hines JE, Arnold TW, Fieberg J, Smith JL. 2019. Impact of prey occupancy and other ecological and anthropogenic factors on tiger distribution in Thailand’s western forest complex. Ecology and Evolution. 9:2449–2458. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ece3.4845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4845

Hayward MW, Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B. 2012. Prey preferences of the tiger Panthera tigris. Journal of Zoology. 286:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00871.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00871.x

Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 25:1965–1978. https://doi.org/ 10.1002 /joc.1276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276

Hines JE. 2006. PRESENCE- Software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. USGSPWRC. http://www.mbrwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html

Hines JE, Nichols JD, Royle JA, MacKenzie DI, Gopalaswamy AM, Kumar NS, Karanth KU. 2010. Tigers on trails: occupancy modeling for cluster sampling. Ecological Applications. 20:1456–1466. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0321.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0321.1

Jenks KE, Howard J, Leimgruber P. 2012. Do ranger stations deter poaching activity in national parks in Thailand? Biotropica. 44:826–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00869.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00869.x

Johnson A, Vongkhamheng C, Hedemark M, Saithongdam T. 2006. Effects of human-carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR. Animal Conservation. 9:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x

Jornburom P, Duangchantrasiri S, Jinamoy S, Pattanavibool A, Hines JE, Arnold TW, Fieberg J, Smith JL. 2020. Habitat use by tiger prey in Thailand’s Western Forest Complex: What will it take to fill a half-full tiger landscape? Journal for Nature Conservation. 58:125896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc. 2020.125896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125896

Karanth KU, Gopalaswamy AM, Kumar NS, Vaidyanathan S, Nichols JD, MacKenzie D. 2011. Monitoring carnivore populations at the landscape-scale: occupancy modelling of tigers from sign surveys. Journal of Applied Ecology. 48:1048–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365 2664.2011.02002.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02002.x

Karanth KU, Kumar NS, Srinivas V, Gopalaswamy A. 2008. Revised monitoring framework for Tigers Forever-Panthera sites. Technical Support Team-Tigers Forever. Bangalore, India: WCSIndia.

Karanth KU, Nichols JD, Kumar NS, Link WA, Hines JE. 2004. Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 101:4854–4858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306210101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306210101

Karanth KU, Stith BM. 1999. Prey depletion as a critical determinant of tiger population viability. In Siedensticker J, Christie S, Jackson P editors. Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human dominated landscapes. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p. 100–113.

Kilgo JC, Labisky RF, Fritzen DE. 1998. Influences of hunting on the behavior of white-tailed deer: implications for conservation of the Florida panther. Conservation Biology. 12:1359–1364. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97223.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97223.x

Linkie M, Chapron G, Martyr DJ, Holden J, Leader-Williams N. 2006. Assessing the viability of tiger subpopulations in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology. 43:576–586. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2664. 2006.01153.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01153.x

Lynam AJ, Rabinowitz A, Myint T, Maung M, Latt KT, Po SHT. 2009. Estimating abundance with sparse data: tigers in northern Myanmar. Population Ecology. 51:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-008-0093-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-008-0093-5

MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, et al. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology. 83:2248–2255. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:ESORWD]2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:ESORWD]2.0.CO;2

Naing H, Fuller TK, Sievert PR, Randhir TO, Po SHT, Maung M, Lynam AJ, Htun A, Thaw WN, Myint T. 2015. Assessing large mammal and bird richness from camera-trap records in the Hukaung Valley of Northern Myanmar. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 63:376–388. http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank. org:pub:89DE5E17 293E 42A6 9245 579D86B291DB

Papworth S, Rao M, Oo MM, et al. 2017. The impact of gold mining and agricultural concessions on the tree cover and local communities in northern Myanmar. Scientific Reports. 7:1–11. https://doi.org/1 0.1038/srep46594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46594

Phumanee W, Steinmetz R, Phoonjampa R, et al. 2020. Occupancy-based monitoring of ungulate prey species in Thailand indicates population stability, but limited recovery. Ecosphere. 11:e03208. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3208

Punjabi GA, Rao MK. 2017. Large herbivore populations outside protected areas in the human-dominated Western Ghats, India. Mammalian Biology. 87:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.05.004

Rao M, Myint T, Zaw T, Htun S. 2005. Hunting patterns in tropical forests adjoining the Hkakaborazi National Park, north Myanmar. Oryx. 39:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605305000724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605305000724

Rayan DM, Linkie M. 2015. Conserving tigers in Malaysia: A science-driven approach for eliciting conservation policy change. Biological Conservation. 184:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.12.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.12.024

Saisamorn A, Duengkae P, Pattanavibool A, Duangchantrasiri S, Simcharoen A, Smith JL. 2019. Spatial and temporal analysis of leopards (Panthera pardus), their prey and tigers (Panthera tigris) in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Folia Oecologica. 46:73–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/ foecol-2019-0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2019-0010

Simcharoen A, Savini T, Gale GA, Roche E, Chimchome V, Smith JL. 2014. Ecological factors that influence sambar (Rusa unicolor) distribution and abundance in western Thailand: implications for tiger conservation. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 62:100–106. http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3528409A-62CE-4F2D-8713-06D47FF98585

Steinmetz R, Chutipong W, Seuaturien N, Chirngsaard E, Khaengkhetkarn M. 2010. Population recovery patterns of Southeast Asian ungulates after poaching. Biological Conservation. 143:42–51. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon. 2009.08.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.023

Suksavate S, Dumsrisuk Y, Indarabut P, Godfrey A, Saosoong S, Harihar A, Samad I, Sukmasuang R, Duengkae P. 2022. Spatial and temporal habitat use by the main prey species of tigers in two protected areas of Thailand’s Southern Western Forest Complex. Environment and Natural Resources Journal. 20:563–574. https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ennrj/article/view/247161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32526/ennrj/20/202200046

Taylor RB, Hellgren EC, Gabor TM, Ilse LM. 1998. Reproduction of feral pigs in southern Texas. Journal of Mammalogy. 79:1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1383024

Thapa K, Kelly MJ. 2017. Prey and tigers on the forgotten trail: high prey occupancy and tiger habitat use reveal the importance of the understudied Churia habitat of Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation. 26:593–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1260-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1260-1

Vié JC, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN. (eds) 2009. Wildlife in a Changing World –An analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/RL-2009-001.pdf

Vinitpornsawan S. 2013. Population and spatial ecology of tigers and leopards relative to prey availability and human activity in Thung Yai Naresuan (East) Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Ph.D. Thesis. USA: University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Vongkhamheng C, Johnson A, Sunquist ME. 2013. A baseline survey of ungulate abundance and distribution in northern Lao: implications for conservation. Oryx. 47:544–552. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0030605312000233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605312000233

Walston J, Robinson JG, Bennett EL, Breitenmoser U, da Fonseca GAB, Goodrich J, Gumal M, Hunter L, Johnson A, Karanth KU, et al. 2010. Bringing the tiger back from the brink - the six percent solution. PLoS Biology. 8:e1000485 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000485

Supporting Agencies

Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA Wildlife Conservation Society Myanmar Program, Yangon 11051, Myanmar

Naing, H., Fuller, T. K., Sievert, P. R., Randhir, T. O., Tha Po, S. H., Htun, S., & Myint, T. (2023). Dry-season habitat occupancy by ungulate tiger prey in the Hukaung Valley of northern Myanmar. Tropical Zoology, 36(1-2). https://doi.org/10.4081/tz.2023.124

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations