Attitudinal meanings of Judgement in the inaugural addresses by the US presidents during the Cold War

Submitted: 2 September 2011
Accepted: 21 May 2012
Published: 7 August 2012
Abstract Views: 3638
PDF: 704
Appendix I and II: 661
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The Appraisal Theory intends to study how the stance, the opinion and the attitude of language users are realized in discourses. This paper discusses the attitudinal meanings of Judgement in the inaugural addresses by the US presidents during the Cold War under the framework laid down by Martin and White. It has been found that the attitudinal meanings of Judgement account for the most part of all the attitudinal meanings in all the 11 addresses, and that the positive Judgements are foregrounded by its high percentage in all the attitudinal meanings of Judgement. The features in the use of attitudinal meanings of Judgement serve the purpose of the presidential inaugural addresses very well, i.e. to convey a new administration’s commitment to their future work and to win support from the audience.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Supporting Agencies

How to Cite

Zhang, S. (2012). Attitudinal meanings of Judgement in the inaugural addresses by the US presidents during the Cold War. Antiqua, 2(1), e2. https://doi.org/10.4081/antiqua.2012.e2