Measuring heavy metal content in bone using portable X-ray fluorescence


Submitted: 24 December 2013
Accepted: 24 December 2013
Published: 28 May 2014
Abstract Views: 1843
PDF: 763
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Nicole C. Little Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, Suitland, MD, United States.
  • Victoria Florey Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, Suitland, MD, United States.
  • Irma Molina Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, Suitland, MD, United States.
  • Douglas W. Owsley Division of Physical Anthropology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States.
  • Robert J. Speakman Center for Applied Isotope Studies, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
The ability of inorganic-based analytical chemistry techniques to quantify trace amounts of heavy metals in skeletal remains has been integral for understanding health and social status in human populations. Low detection limits and the sensitivity of inductively coupled plasma- mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and other techniques to most elements on the periodic table are ideally suited for the quantification of lead (Pb) and other heavy metals in bone. However, the time required for sample preparation and analysis, expense, destructive analytical process, and availability of instrumentation often limit researchers’ ability to utilise these techniques for archaeological applications. This paper explores the use of portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) instrumentation for heavy metal analysis of bone as an alternative to more traditional analytical techniques. XRF has been shown to be an extremely useful tool for archaeologists seeking to conduct quantitative analyses of cultural materials such as obsidian and metals. However, little research has been undertaken to assess the usefulness of portable XRF for measuring heavy metals found in low concentrations in archaeological bone. This paper compares data derived from ICP-MS and portable XRF analyses of bone. Results demonstrate that XRF analyses of bone are problematic due to diagenesis and variability of Pb content in bone.

Supporting Agencies


Little, N. C., Florey, V., Molina, I., Owsley, D. W., & Speakman, R. J. (2014). Measuring heavy metal content in bone using portable X-ray fluorescence. Open Journal of Archaeometry, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/arc.2014.5257

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations