The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence

  • Sonali Coulter | sonali.coulter@qut.edu.au Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Jason A. Roberts Burns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane; Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Krispin Hajkowicz Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Kate Halton Faculty of Health, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Abstract

This review sets out to evaluate the current evidence on the impact of inappropriate therapy on bloodstream infections (BSI) and associated mortality. Based on the premise that better prescribing practices should result in better patient outcomes, BSI mortality may be a useful metric to evaluate antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. A systematic search was performed in key medical databases to identify papers published in English between 2005 and 2015 that examined the association between inappropriate prescribing and BSI mortality in adult patients. Only studies that included BSIs caused by ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium/faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter species) organisms were included. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE criteria and results combined using a narrative synthesis. We included 46 studies. Inappropriate prescribing was associated with an overall increase in mortality in BSI. In BSI caused by resistant gram positive organisms, such as methicillin resistant S. aureus, inappropriate therapy resulted in up to a 3-fold increase in mortality. In BSI caused by gram negative (GN) resistant organisms a much greater impact ranging from 3 to 25 fold increase in the risk of mortality was observed. While the overall quality of the studies is limited by design and the variation in the definition of appropriate prescribing, there appears to be some evidence to suggest that inappropriate prescribing leads to increased mortality in patients due to GN BSI. The highest impact of inappropriate prescribing was seen in patients with GN BSI, which may be a useful metric to monitor the impact of AMS interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

METRICS

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Dimensions

Altmetric

Published
2017-03-30
Keywords:
Antimicrobial stewardship, bloodstream infection, mortality, antibiotic resistance, ESKAPE organism
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 1273

  • PDF: 543
  • Supplementary Material: 264
  • HTML: 380
How to Cite
Coulter, S., Roberts, J., Hajkowicz, K., & Halton, K. (2017). The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence. Infectious Disease Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/idr.2017.6849