Retroperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy


Published: November 7, 2013
Abstract Views: 2824
PDF: 494
HTML: 805
Retroperitoneal Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephrectomy and Partial Nephrectomy: 0
Table 1: 0
Figure 1: 0
Figure 2: 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Nosratollah Nezakatzgoo Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
  • Janet Colli Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
  • Matthew Mutter Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
  • Sheg Aranmolate Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
  • Robert Wake Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
The purpose of the present paper is to describe our technique and experience with retroperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) nephrectomies as an alternative to the transperitoneal approach. Eight retroperitoneal HAL nephrectomies and one partial nephrectomy were performed. Several excisional techniques were employed incorporating the Harmonic scalpel or Ligasure device. Hemostatic agents were used to cover the renal defect. Surgical bolsters were sutured to the renal capsule with pleget reinforcements to aid in hemostasis. The average operative time was 210 min and estimated blood loss 110 mL. Mean change in hematocrit was 3 units and creatinine was 1 point. No patient required a transfusion. There were no major complications, with a mean follow-up of fourteen months. On average, patients resumed oral intake in 2 days, and were discharged in 3 days. Pathological examination revealed that two lesions were benign and seven malignant. Tumor diameter averaged 3 cm. There were no positive surgical margins. In conclusion, we have demonstrated the feasibility of retroperitoneal laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy surgery for solid renal masses.

Nosratollah Nezakatzgoo, Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
Professor, medical doctor and general surgeon.
Janet Colli, Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
Associate Professor of Urology with fellowships in urologic oncology and robotic surgery
Matthew Mutter, Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
Medical doctor and resident in urology at University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sheg Aranmolate, Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
Medical doctor and resident in training at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center.
Robert Wake, Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
Proffesor, medical doctor and head of the department of urology at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center.

Supporting Agencies


Nezakatzgoo, N., Colli, J., Mutter, M., Aranmolate, S., & Wake, R. (2013). Retroperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy. Surgical Techniques Development, 3(1), e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/std.2013.e3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations