Le linee guida italiane sulle terapie psicologiche di ansia e depressione: un’innovazione o un’occasione persa?


Pubblicato: 6 September 2023
Abstract views:
426


PDF:
258
PDF (English):
12
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

In questo contributo mi propongo di riassumere i miei commenti al dibattito in corso sulla Consensus Conference sulle Terapie Psicologiche per Ansia e Depressione. Nell’ottica scientifica di implementazione delle linee guida avviate dall’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ho scelto di impostare le mie riflessioni nel formato di una peer-review, andando dunque ad individuare cinque aree che potrebbero beneficiare di una revisione. Ovviamente quelle che qui esprimo sono opinioni fallibili che cerco di motivare a partire dalla letteratura scientifica esistente.


Chapman, B.P., Talbot, N., Tatman, A.W., Brition, P.C. (2009). Personality Traits and the Working Alliance in Psychotherapy Trainees: An Organizing Role for the Five Factor Model? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2009.28.5.577

Chevance, A., Ravaud, P., Tomlinson, A., Le Berre, C., Teufer, B., Touboul, S., Fried, E.I., Gartlehner, G., Cipriani, A., Tran, V.T. (2020). Identifying outcomes for depression that matter to patients, informal caregivers, and health-care professionals: qualitative content analysis of a large international online survey. The Lancet. Psychiatry, 7:692-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30191-7

Clark, D.M. (2018). Realizing the Mass Public Benefit of Evidence-Based Psychological Therapies: The IAPT Program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 14:159-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084833

Cuijpers, P., Berking, M., Andersson, G., Quigley, L., Kleiboer, A., Dobson, K. S. (2013). A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 58:376-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371305800702

D’Andreamatteo, A., Ianni, L., Lega, F., Sargiacomo, M. (2015). Lean in healthcare: A comprehensive review. Health Policy, 119:1197-1209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.02.002

Gorman, J.M. (1996). Comorbid depression and anxiety spectrum disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 4:160-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1996)4:4<160::AID-DA2>3.0.CO;2-J

Hirschfeld, R.M. (1999). Personality disorders and depression: comorbidity. Depression and Anxiety, 10:142-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1999)10:4<142::AID-DA2>3.0.CO;2-Q

Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS). (2022). Consensus Conference sulle Terapie Psicologiche per Ansia e Depressione, p. 8.

McEvoy, P.M., Watson, H., Watkins, E.R., Nathan, P. (2013). The relationship between worry, rumination, and comorbidity: evidence for repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic construct. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151:313-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.014

Naragon-Gainey, K., Watson, D. (2018). What Lies Beyond Neuroticism? An Examination of the Unique Contributions of Social-Cognitive Vulnerabilities to Internalizing Disorders. Assessment, 25:143-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116659741

Springer, K.S., Levy, H.C., Tolin, D.F. (2018). Remission in CBT for adult anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 61:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.03.002

Cheli, S. (2023). Le linee guida italiane sulle terapie psicologiche di ansia e depressione: un’innovazione o un’occasione persa?. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2023.734

Downloads

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Citations