Perception and acceptance of medical photography among Arab dermatology patients: a cross-sectional analysis
https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2024.9925
Accepted: 27 January 2024
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Background: Medical photography has been utilized in clinical, academic, and research settings. In conservative countries, such as Saudi Arabia, limited data reflect patients’ viewpoints on medical photography. Objectives: To assess patients’ opinions on medical photography and the factors influencing its acceptability. Methods: A cross-sectional study utilizing a self-distributed paper-based questionnaire was performed in the dermatology clinics at King Abdulaziz Medical City (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) between February 2020 and January 2021. The response rate is 100% as only willing participants were handed a hard-copy survey and then retrieved once completed. Results: A total of 414 Saudi adults were enrolled. Medical photography was highly acceptable, fairly acceptable, and poorly acceptable in 36.7%, 11.6%, and 14.3% of the patients, respectively. Females were more accepting of medical photography than males (p = 0.041). Physicians were the most preferred choice as photographers (83%). Stating all intended use of the photographs was favored by the majority of patients. Using a department-owned camera was essential to 84%. Patients who never had their photographs taken previously were more unaccepting of medical photography than those with prior experience (p = 0.037). Limitations: the study was conducted at a single center; therefore, it may not represent the entire population. Conclusions: Medical photography is acceptable to the majority of patients. Meeting popular preferences, including physicians as photographers, using department-owned cameras, and stating all possible uses of the photographs may enhance patients’ experience. The findings offer insight for developing a standardized framework that is suitable for both patients and physicians.
Harting MT, DeWees JM, Vela KM, Khirallah RT. Medical photography: current technology, evolving issues and legal perspectives. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69(4):401-409. doi:10.1111/ijcp.12627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12627
Kunde L, McMeniman E, Parker M. Clinical photography in dermatology: ethical and medico-legal considerations in the age of digital and smartphone technology. Australas J Dermatol. 2013;54(3):192-197. doi:10.1111/ajd.12063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12063
Hsieh C, Yun D, Bhatia AC, Hsu JT, Ruiz de Luzuriaga AM. Patient perception on the usage of smartphones for medical photography and for reference in dermatology. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(1):149-154. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000000213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000213
Hacard F, Maruani A, Delaplace M, et al. Patients' acceptance of medical photography in a French adult and paediatric dermatology department: a questionnaire survey. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(2):298-305. doi:10.1111/bjd.12345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12345
London K. Photography in dermatology: a dermatologist's perspective. J Vis Commun Med. 2010;33(4):188-190. doi:10.3109/17453054.2010.525449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453054.2010.525449
Berle I. Clinical photography and patient rights: the need for orthopraxy. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(2):89-92. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.019166
Leger MC, Wu T, Haimovic A, et al. Patient perspectives on medical photography in dermatology. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(9):1028-1037. doi:10.1097/01.DSS.0000452632.22081.79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DSS.0000452632.22081.79
Wang Y, Tan H, Yang X. Perception and Acceptability of Medical Photography in Chinese Dermatologic Patients: A Questionnaire Survey. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(3):437-442. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000000984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000984
Katugampola R, Lake A. The role of photography in dermatology research. J Vis Commun Med. 2012;35(1):5-10. doi:10.3109/17453054.2012.656584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453054.2012.656584
Lakdawala N, Fontanella D, Grant-Kels JM. Ethical considerations in dermatologic photography. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30(5):486-491. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.06.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.06.017
Mahar P, Baker C, Mar A, Foley P. Protecting the role of clinical photography in dermatology. Australas J Dermatol. 2013;54(3):238-239. doi:10.1111/ajd.12089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12089
Van der Rijt R, Hoffman S. Ethical considerations of clinical photography in an area of emerging technology and smartphones. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(3):211-212. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101479
Institute of Medical Illustrators, IMI [Internet]. [cited 2018 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.imi.org.uk/
Lau CK, Schumacher HH, Irwin MS. Patients' perception of medical photography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(6):e507-e511. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.11.005
WHO | Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. WHO [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2018 May 28]; Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/
Franchitto N, Gavarri L, Dédouit F, Telmon N, Rougé D. Photography, patient consent and scientific publications: medicolegal aspects in France. J Forensic Leg Med. 2008;15(4):210-212. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2007.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2007.08.004
Creighton S, Alderson J, Brown S, Minto CL. Medical photography: ethics, consent and the intersex patient. BJU Int. 2002;89(1):67-72. doi:10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01809.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01809.x
Torul D, Omezli MM. The influence of education and gender on the esthetic perception of facial profile. Int J Esthet Dent. 2022;17(1):88-99.
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
