Analysts parents and child patients? A retrospective survey
https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2015.326
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
The article presents a retrospective review of the use of the metaphor of child development in relational thinking. The first relational critiques of the evolutionary derailment model and the feminist authors' relentlessness against the concept of holding in clinical work pushed relationalists towards a representation of the patient as necessarily adult and of analytical dialogue as intersubjective by definition. In my Winnicottian/relational perspective I expanded the concept of holding and proposed mediations that would make possible the coexistence of holding and relational thinking, exploring how the analyst's participation makes the holding experience possible. In reviewing and updating the terms of the controversy, the author offers new ideas on the clinical function of the holding company in buffering the sense of shame.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Downloads
Citations
